Bombay High Court
VENKATESH PRABHU MONIversusTHE COLLECTOR OF NORTH GOA REVENUE BRANCH AND 35 ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed of
- Bench
- NEELA GOKHALE
Holding
The Court granted a two‑month extension for deposit of the amount, deeming it the petitioner’s last opportunity, and ordered execution of the sale deed within one month.
Summary
The petitioner, Venkatesh Prabhu Moni, sought a further two‑month extension to deposit Rs.4,52,80,208 with interest, after a prior three‑month extension had expired. The High Court noted that the respondent had not objected to the earlier extension and that this would be the petitioner’s last opportunity to comply. Counsel for respondents highlighted that the petitioner had also failed to execute a sale deed as previously directed. The petitioner’s counsel agreed to execute the sale deed within one month. Consequently, the Court granted the requested two‑month extension for deposit and ordered the sale deed to be executed within a month, disposing both miscellaneous civil applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to a further extension of time to deposit the stipulated amount
- Whether the petitioner must execute the sale deed as directed by the Court
Subjects
- extension of time
- deposit of money
- sale deed
- civil procedure
- writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:932
903 MCA 225 2026
Jose
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1455 OF 2025 (F)
VENKATESH PRABHU MONI ... APPLICANT
Versus
THE COLLECTOR OF NORTH GOA REVENUE
BRANCH AND 35 ORS. ... RESPONDENTS
WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1455 OF 2025 (F)
Mr Tarun Rebello, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr Prashil Arolkar, Additional Government Advocate for the
State in MCA No.225/2026.
Mr S. P. Munk, Additional Government Advocate for the State
in MCA No.226/2026.
Mr Shithil Prabhu Dessai (through V.C.) with Ms S. Veluskar,
Advocates for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
Mr Neelesh Takkekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 36.
CORAM:- DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
DATED :- 28th April, 2026
P.C.:
1. By order dated 23rd December, 2025, this Court had extended the
time to deposit the amount of Rs.4,52,80,208/- for a period of three
months from the date of the order. The Respondent had not raised any
objection for the said extension at that time. It appears that the
extended time to deposit the said amount has also now expired and by
Page 1 of 2
28th April, 2026
903 MCA 225 2026
way of these applications, the Petitioner seeks further extension of two
months. to deposit the said amount.
2. For reasons mentioned in the applications, time to deposit the
balance amount of Rs. 4,52,80,208/- along with interest as per the
order dated 1st August, 2025, stands extended for a period of three
months from today. It is made clear that this is the last opportunity that
would be given to the Petitioner.
3. Mr Takkekar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 3 to
36, though, has not seriously objected to the extension of time;
however, he has brought to my notice that the Petitioner was put to
terms and was directed to execute the sale deed in his favour, which
the Petitioner has till date failed to do.
4. Mr. Tarun Rebello, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner
states, on instructions, that the Petitioner shall take steps to execute the
sale deed within a period of one month from today.
5. Both Misc. Civil Applications stand disposed accordingly.
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO
DSOUZA
Page 2 of 2
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 28/04/2026 16:42:47 28th April, 2026
Checking your session…