Bombay High Court
Rajashree Machindra TheteversusMachhindra Babulal Thete
- Disposal
- Rejected at Admission stage
Holding
The application for transfer of the marriage petition was rejected.
Summary
The applicant-wife sought to have Marriage Petition No. 70 of 2026 transferred from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chalisgaon to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon. She argued that the 100 km distance, lack of personal income, and absence of accompaniment would cause financial hardship in attending court in Chalisgaon. The court noted that both towns are sizable, well‑connected by road and rail, and found no substantive ground beyond the financial claim to justify a transfer. It suggested that the wife could seek a direction for the husband to bear travel expenses or request video‑conferencing to appear. Consequently, the transfer application was rejected. The court indicated that a video‑conferencing application, if filed, may be entertained.
Issues considered
- Whether the marriage petition should be transferred from Chalisgaon to Kopargaon on the basis of distance and alleged financial hardship.
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- marriage petition
- financial hardship
- video conferencing
- jurisdiction
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40138
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 249 OF 2026
Rajashree Machindra Thete
VERSUS
Machhindra Babulal Thete
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rodge Krishna Pratap
...
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
Dated : September 02, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The present application is filed seeking transfer of Marriage
Petition No. 70 of 2026 from the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Chalisgaon to the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division,
Kopargaon.
2. The applicant-wife is aged around 41 years. The distance
between the two places is around 100 kilometers. Both cities are
sufficiently big cities which are well connected by road and rail. The
children of the parties are staying with the non-applicant husband.
3. Except for the statement that the wife does not have any source
of income and will face financial hardship in traveling from Kopargaon
to Chalisgaon for attending the court case, and that there is nobody to
accompany her for attending the court proceedings at Chalisgaon, no
other ground is raised in support of the transfer application.
Page 1 of 2
912 MCA 249-2026
4. Having regard to the distance between the two places as also
the connectivity by modes of public transport, this Court sees no
reason to allow the application. The application is therefore rejected.
5. As far as the contention with respect to financial hardship is
concerned, the same can be taken care of by moving an appropriate
application before the learned Court seeking directions to the
husband to make payment of an appropriate amount for traveling
and other expenses, as well as seeking permission for the applicant-
wife to appear through video conferencing.
6. In the event the applicant-wife makes an application for
appearance through video-conferencing, the same may be
considered favorably and permission to appear through video-
conferencing may be granted on such dates and at such stages as is
deemed appropriate by the learned concerned Court.
( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…