Bombay High Court
Yogita @ Seema Krushna BhadkeversusKrishna Dashrath Bhadke and Another
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
- Bench
- Y G KHOBRAGADE
Holding
The Hindu Marriage Petition must be transferred to the court nearer to the wife’s residence, as the wife’s convenience governs transfer under CPC s.24.
Summary
The wife, Yogita @ Seema Krushna Bhadke, filed a Hindu marriage petition for divorce in Pune. After experiencing cruelty, she moved back to her parents’ home in Ambajogai, Beed, a distance of about 275 km, and sought transfer of the petition to the nearer court under CPC s.24. The husband opposed the transfer. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in N.C.V. Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik (Civil Appeal No. 4894/2022), the judge emphasized that in matrimonial matters the wife’s convenience is paramount. Accordingly, the application for transfer was allowed and the petition was moved to the Civil Judge’s court in Ambajogai, with the husband permitted to appear via video‑conferencing if needed.
Issues considered
- The applicability of Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to transfer a matrimonial proceeding.
- The extent to which the wife’s convenience should influence the decision to transfer the case.
Legislation cited
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- matrimonial proceedings
- wife convenience
- CPC s.24
- Hindu Marriage Act
- divorce
- video conferencing
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:15292
930mca304-25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2025
Yogita @ Seema Krushna Bhadke
VERSUS
Krishna Dashrath Bhadke And Another
...
Mr. Ambad Shrinivas Abhimanyu, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. Upendra A. Khekale, Advocate for non applicants.
CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
Dated : 8th April, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned
counsel appearing for the non applicant at length.
2. By the present application under section 24 of the Civil
Procedure Code, the applicant wife is seeking transfer of Hindu
Marriage Petition No.952 of 2022 pending on the file of learned Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Pune to the court of learned Civil Judge, Senior
Division. Ambajogai, District Beed.
3. Admittedly, the marriage between the applicant and the non-
applicant was solemnized on 07.05.2017 as per the customs and rites
prevailing in their society. After the marriage, the applicant cohabited
with the non-applicant. Out out the wedlock, the applicant and non
applicant are blessed with a female child, now aged about seven years.
However, subsequently, the non-applicant subjected the applicant to ill-
treatment and cruelty on various grounds, leading to marital discord
1 of 3
930mca304-25
between them. Consequently, she started residing with her parents at
village Deola Tq. Ambajogai District Beed. Thereafter, the non-
applicant filed proceedings bearing Hindu Marriage Petition No.
Marriage Petition No.952 of 2022 before the learned Civil Judge,
Senior Division, Pune seeking a decree of divorce.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant canvassed that the
applicant is a housewife and residing with her parents at village Deola
Tq. Ambajogai alongwith her minor child. The distance between
Ambajogai and Pune is about 275 kilometers. Therefore, it will be
inconvenient for the applicant to travel with a minor child and bear
the travelling expenses.
5. In the case of N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A. S. Saravana Karthik
Sha (Civil Appeal No.4894/2022) decided by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court on 18.07.2022, in paragraph No.9, it is held that:
“9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under
section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of
justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other
proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are
called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to
take into consideration the economic soundness of both the
parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural
pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and
subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in
eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella
they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing
socio-economic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is
the wife's convenience which must be looked at while
considering transfer."
2 of 3
930mca304-25
10. It is well settled that, while transferring any matrimonial
proceeding from one Court to another, the convenience of the
wife/female is required to be taken into consideration. Therefore,
considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
above cited case, it is necessary to withdraw Hindu Marriage Petition
No.952 of 2022 pending on the file of learned Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Pune and transfer the same to the court of learned Civil
Judge, Senior Division. Ambajogai, District Beed for disposal in
accordance with law.
11. In view of the above discussions, following order is passed:
ORDER
(1) Misc. Civil application is allowed.
(2) Hindu Marriage Petition No.952 of 2022 pending on the file of
learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune is hereby transferred
to court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division. Ambajogai,
District Beed for disposal in accordance with law.
(3) The Non applicant shall be at liberty to appear through Video
Conferencing facility, in case he is having difficulty to personally
appear before the .
(3) The order be communicated to the concerned courts.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. )
JPChavan
3 of 3
Checking your session…