Bombay High Court

Shilpa Mohan ShuklaversusMohan Manik Shukla

Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: Y G KHOBRAGADE

Holding

The court may correct clerical and typographical errors in its orders to reflect the intended content.

Summary

The applicant, Shilpa Mohan Shukla, filed a praecipe seeking correction of typographical errors in an order dated 28.01.2026. The errors involved the incorrect naming of the court as “Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune” instead of the correct “Civil Judge Senior Division, Indapur, District Pune” in several paragraphs. The court examined whether such clerical mistakes could be rectified through a correction order. It held that the court has the authority to amend its orders to correct clerical and typographical errors to reflect the true intent. Consequently, the court ordered the necessary corrections and directed that the corrected order be uploaded, disposing of the praecipe.

Issues considered

Whether the court can correct typographical errors in its own order through a praecipe

Subjects

order correction
clerical error
civil procedure
praecipe

Judgment

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //


                                                            918-MCA-308-2025.odt




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

             918 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 308 OF 2025

                     SHILPA MOHAN SHUKLA
                            VERSUS
                     MOHAN MANIK SHUKLA
                              .…
 Mr. Saurabh R. Nikat, h/f Mr. Chandrasen Aashruba Shingare,
 Advocate for the Applicant
                              .…

                           CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

                               DATE : February 12, 2026
 PER COURT :-

 1.              By the present praecipe, the applicant seeks correction
 in the order dated 28.01.2026, in respect of the Court.


 2.              In paragraph No.3 line No.3, instead of “Civil Judge
 Senior Division, Pune”, it should be “Civil Judge Senior Division,
 Indapur, District Pune”.


 3.              In paragraph No.4 last line, instead of “Civil Judge
 Senior Division, Pune”, it should be “Civil Judge Senior Division,
 Indapur, District Pune”.


 4.              In paragraph No.8 line No.3, instead of “Civil Judge
 Senior Division, Pune”, it should be “Civil Judge Senior Division,
 Indapur, District Pune”.



                                                                          1 of 2
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //


                                               (( 2 ))         918-MCA-308-2025




5.              In paragraph No.10, line No.2, instead of “Civil Judge
Senior Division, Pune”, it should be “Civil Judge Senior Division,
Indapur, District Pune”.


6.              The order be corrected and the corrected order be
uploaded.


7.              Accordingly, the praecipe is disposed off.




                                                  [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ]
SMS




                                                                                  2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…