Bombay High Court
SMT. SEEMA RAMDAS GAWADEversusSHRI SOMNATH RAMDAS GAWADE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The application for transfer of the injunction suit under Section 24 CPC is dismissed as no sufficient ground exists.
Summary
The applicant filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking transfer of a suit for injunction filed by the respondents in Pune to the court at Thane, arguing convenience because both suits relate to the same property. The applicant’s own suit for partition and separate possession is earlier in time. The court held that the ground raised does not justify transfer and that the applicant could instead seek a stay under Section 10 if appropriate. The respondents indicated willingness to settle and obtain a partition decree. Consequently, the application for transfer was dismissed, and the parties' claims for partition remain open for determination in the trial court upon proper application.
Issues considered
- Whether a suit for injunction can be transferred to another court under Section 24 CPC on the ground of convenience due to a related suit.
- Whether the existence of a prior partition suit provides a basis for transfer of the injunction suit.
- Whether the applicant should instead seek a stay of proceedings under Section 10 CPC.
Legislation cited
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 10, 24
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- Section 24 CPC
- injunction
- partition suit
- jurisdiction
- stay of proceedings
- Civil Procedure Code
Judgment
32-MCA-329-2025.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 329 OF 2025
Swapnil
Seema Ramdas Gawade. …Applicant
Vs.
Somnath Ramdas Gawade and Ors. …Respondents
Mr. S. C. wakankar for the applicant.
Mr. Arjun S. Pawar for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. This application is filed under Section 24 of the Civil
Procedure Code, 1908 (“CPC”) for transfer of the suit filed for
injunction by the respondent in the court at Pune to the court
at Thane. The ground for transfer raised in the application is
that since both the suit seeks reliefs in respect of the same
property, it would be convenient that the suit filed in the court
at Pune be transferred to the court at Thane.
2. The applicant’s suit is for partition and separate
possession. The suit filed by the respondent is for injunction.
Since the applicant’s suit is prior in time, it is always open for
the applicant to file an application under Section 10 of the
1/2
32-MCA-329-2025.docx
CPC, if the grounds contemplated under Section 10 of the
CPC are available for stay of the proceedings. The ground
raised in the application is no ground to permit transfer of the
suit filed in the court at Pune to the court at Thane.
3. Even otherwise, learned counsel for the respondent
submits that though they have filed the written statement,
they are agreeable to amicably resolve the dispute and agree
for partition and separate possession. Hence, it is open for
the parties to file appropriate application in the trial court
seeking decree for partition.
4. The miscellaneous civil application, is therefore,
dismissed.
5. All the rival contentions of the parties on seeking
decree for partition are kept open, to be decided in the trial
court if an appropriate application is filed by the parties.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Checking your session…