Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GCA GHAI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD THR. AUTH. REPRESENTATIVE KSHITZ AGGRAWALversusATMARAM RAJARAM SHET ALIAS SHETGAONKAR AND 146 ORS.

Disposal
Disposed of

Holding

The amendment is allowed.

Summary

The applicant, Goa Ghai Infrastructures Ltd., filed Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 508/2026 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking an amendment to a prior order. The respondents, including Atmaram Rajaram Shet and others, filed a no‑objection to the amendment. The court examined the respondents' lack of objection and concluded that there was no impediment to permitting the amendment. Accordingly, the court ordered that the amendment be effected forthwith. The application was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the amendment sought by the applicant should be allowed in view of the respondents' no‑objection

Subjects

  • amendment
  • miscellaneous civil application
  • no objection
  • High Court of Bombay at Goa
  • order disposal

Judgment

                                                              18-MCA-508-2026.DOC




                                  Suchitra



                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

                                                  MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.508/2026
                                                                   IN
                                                    APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.39/2026



                                   GOA GHAI INFRASTRUCTURES LTD
                                   THR. AUTH. REPRESENTATIVE KSHITZ                   … APPLICANT
                                   AGGRAWAL

                                         Versus

                                   ATMARAM RAJARAM SHET ALIAS
                                   SHETGAONKAR AND 146 ORS.                           … RESPONDENTS


                                   Mr Vilas hali and Mr Rajdeep Prabhugaonkar, Advocates for the
                                   Applicant.

                                   Mr Arjun Naik, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 to 19, 21
                                   to 27, 29 to 31, 34 and 35.


                                                      CORAM:            VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

                                                      DATED:            10th SEPTEMBER 2026

                                   P.C. :

                                  1.         In view of the no objection given by the Respondents, the
                                  application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.


                                  2.         Misc. Civil Application No.508/2026 stands disposed of.


                                                                              VALMIKI MENEZES, J.


Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN                                            Page 1 of 1
SINGBAL                                                         10th September 2026
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 10/09/2026 15:17:33


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.