Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NANU ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR SANKALP SANDESH NAIKversusTAJDIN JAVERBHAI MAVANY (SINCE DEC.) REP. THROUGH HIS LRS

Disposal
Disposed of

Holding

The Court allowed the application, directing the registry to provide the requested rent and interest particulars and permitting the applicant to raise a GST invoice.

Summary

The applicant, NanU Engineering Private Ltd, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking the registry's direction to disclose the particulars of rent deposited under an interim order dated 23 July 2014 and to break down the interest component of the total amount of Rs.65,39,627 paid. The applicant also requested liberty to raise a GST invoice against the appellant. The respondents did not object to the directions being given. The Court, after noting the lack of objection, allowed the application as prayed, directing the registry to provide the requested particulars and permitting the applicant to raise a GST invoice. The application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the registry should be directed to furnish particulars of the rent deposited by the appellant under the interim order
  • Whether the registry should disclose the interest component within the total amount paid
  • Whether the applicant may be permitted to raise a GST invoice against the appellant

Subjects

  • rent deposit
  • interest component
  • GST invoice
  • registry direction
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-GOA:1897
                                              906 MCA 540 2026

                Amrut

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
                           MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2026
                                            IN
                                SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2013
           NANU ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD
           REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR SANKALP
           SANDESH NAIK                                               ... APPLICANT
             Versus
           TAJDIN JAVERBHAI MAVANY (SINCE
           DEC.) REP. THROUGH HIS LRS                                 ... RESPONDENTS


           Ms Neha Kholkar, Advocate for Applicant.
           Mr S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms S. Kenny, Advocate
           for Respondents.


                                  CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                  DATED :- 24th September, 2026

           P.C.:


           1.           The present application is filed seeking directions against
           Registry to provide particulars of amount of rent deposited by
           Appellant in pursuance of interim order dated 23rd July 2014 in
           Civil Application No.14 of 2013. Applicant further seeks direction
           to furnish particulars of interest component in the total amount of
           Rs.65,39,627/- paid to the Applicant.


           2.              Learned Advocate appearing for Respondents has no
           objection if necessary directions are given to Registry. In that view
           of matter, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and

                                                   Page 1 of 2
                                               24th September, 2026
                                                        906 MCA 540 2026


                     (b). Applicant is at liberty to raise GST invoice against the
                     Appellant.


                     3.          Application stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.



                                                                S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.




Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH
Designation: Private Secretary
                                                             Page 2 of 2
Date: 24/09/2026 13:52:31
                                                         24th September, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.