Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KETAKI GOKHALEversusANAND CHANDANI

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court allowed the application because the respondent raised no objection to the relief sought under prayer clause (a).

Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a miscellaneous civil application arising out of Writ Petition No.1398 of 2023. The applicant, Ketaki Gokhale, sought relief as per prayer clause (a). The respondent, Anand Chandani, through counsel, raised no objection to the grant of the prayer. Consequently, the court allowed the application in accordance with the prayer clause. The matter was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application should be granted as per prayer clause (a) in the absence of any objection from the respondent

Subjects

  • miscellaneous civil application
  • writ petition
  • grant of relief
  • no objection

Judgment

   2026:BHC-GOA:1993
                                                             19 MCA 607 2026

                              Jose

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
                                         MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.607 OF 2026
                                                          IN
                                           WRIT PETITION NO.1398 OF 2023 (F)
                        KETAKI GOKHALE                                            ... APPLICANT
                          Versus
                        ANAND CHANDANI                                            ... RESPONDENT


                        Ms Ashwini Agni (through V.C.) with Ms Rajlaxmi Bhatkar,
                        Advocates for the Applicant.
                        Ms Caroline Collasso, Advocate for the Respondent. (through
                        V.C.)


                                                 CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                 DATED :- 8th October, 2026

                        P.C.:


                        1.        Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties.


                        2.        Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent has no objection
                        to grant of prayer in the application. In that view of the matter,
                        application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).


                        3.        Application stands disposed of.



                                                                    S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.


Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO
DSOUZA
                                                                Page 1 of 1
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 08/10/2026 15:02:39                                     8th October, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.