Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIJAY UMA SHANKAR MISHRAversusTHE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER, MUMBAI AND 9 ORS.

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court corrected the order dated 8 April 2026 to include the appearances of the specified respondents' counsel.

Summary

Dr. Vijay Uma Shankar Mishra filed a public interest litigation (PIL) against the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and other respondents. The court was approached by a praecipe to read the appearances of several advocates in the minutes of the order dated 8 April 2026. The court ordered that the appearances of the listed counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and the State be read into the earlier order. Consequently, the order dated 8 April 2026 was corrected to reflect these appearances. No substantive merits of the PIL were addressed; the proceeding was limited to this procedural correction.

Subjects

  • public interest litigation
  • procedural order
  • appearance correction
  • municipal corporation
  • court order correction

Judgment

                                                                                 (2)-PIL-35-22.doc




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
          Digitally


BALAJI
          signed by
          BALAJI
          GOVINDRAO
                                    PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.35 OF 2022
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL   Date:
          2026.04.23
          11:12:56
          +0530

                       Dr. Vijay Uma Shankar Mishra                          .. Petitioner
                               Vs.
                       The Commissioner,
                       Municipal Corporation of Greater
                       Mumbai & Ors.                                         .. Respondents
                                                            ...
                       None for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy), Advocate for the Respondent
                       No.2/SRA.
                       Smt. Nazia Sheikh, AGP for the Respondent Nos.3, 9 & 10 - State.
                       Ms. Kinjal Kakkad i/by Mr. Jayesh R. Vyas, Advocates for the
                       Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
                       Mr. Shakeeb Shaikh & Mr. Noorain Patel i/by Diamondwalla & Co.,
                       Advocates for the Respondent No.6.
                       Ms. Saloni Sulakhe a/w Adv. Declan Fernandez, Ms. Krushika
                       Udeshi & Mr. Darsh Shah i/by Dhaval Vussonji & Associates,
                       Advocates for the Respondent No.8.
                                         CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ &
                                                 SUMAN SHYAM, J.
                                           DATE : 22nd APRIL 2026.

                       P.C. :

                                 A praecipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order
                       dated 8th April 2026.
                       2.        Appearances of "Mr. Jagdish Aradwad (Reddy), Advocate for
                       Respondent No.2", "Mr. Dinyar Madon, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.
                       Shakeeb Shaikh & Mr. Noorain Patel i/by Diamondwalla & Co.,
                       Advocates for the Respondent No.6" and "Ms. Saloni Sulakhe a/w
                       Adv. Declan Fernandez, Ms. Krushika Udeshi & Mr. Darsh Shah
                       i/by Dhaval Vussonji & Associates, Advocates for the Respondent
                       No.8" shall be read in the order dated 8th April 2026.
                       3.        The order dated 8th April 2026 stands corrected accordingly.


                       [SUMAN SHYAM, J.]                                     [CHIEF JUSTICE]

                       Panchal


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.