Bombay High Court
Jeroosma DsouzaversusJaya Rakesh Misra
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
A petition cannot be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear, and therefore it must be dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Jeroosma Dsouza, filed a perjury petition against Jaya Rakesh Misra in the Bombay High Court. The petition alleged that the respondent had committed perjury. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the earlier hearing, and again the petitioner was absent on the date of this hearing. The respondent was represented by counsel Rahil Jhaveri assisted by Nitesh Menon. The learned judge observed that the petitioner’s absence precluded any further consideration of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a perjury petition may be entertained and decided in the absence of the petitioner’s representation
Subjects
- perjury
- civil procedure
- default
- dismissal
- non-appearance
Judgment
1/1 45-PRJP-3-2025 (OS).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PERJURY PETITION NO. 3 OF 2025
Jeroosma Dsouza ...Petitioner
Versus
Jaya Rakesh Misra ...Respondent
_______
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rahil Jhaveri a/w Nitesh Menon for the Respondent.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026
P.C.
1. Learned counsel for the Respondent points out that on the previous
occasion, none had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. Today once again none is present.
3. Hence, the Petition is dismissed.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.