Bombay High Court
MOHD. IMRAN S/O. MOHD. LATIFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The revision application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Mohd. Imran, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date of 14 August 2026, and again on 21 August 2026. The Court observed that the applicant had lost interest in prosecuting the revision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision application may be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the applicant's counsel
Subjects
- criminal revision
- non‑appearance
- want of prosecution
- procedural dismissal
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38423
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2019
MOHD. IMRAN S/O. MOHD. LATIF
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr.S.G.Sangle, Addl.P.P. for the Respondent/State.
( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. This Court, vide order dated 14.08.2026, has observed that
this Revision Application will be dismissed for non appearance of the
learned Advocate for the Applicant, on the next date.
2. Today also, none appears for the Applicant. As such, it
revealed that the Applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the Criminal
Revision Application, hence stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)
khs/Aug.2026/102
Checking your session…