Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Sachin Arts India Pvt LtdversusAditya chandrakumar kothari

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that leave may be granted to withdraw a criminal revision application while allowing all contentions to remain open, and therefore dismissed the application.

Summary

Sachin Arts India Pvt Ltd filed Criminal Revision Application No. 105 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court against Aditya Chandrakumar Kothari and others. The applicant sought leave to withdraw the revision while preserving all of its substantive contentions. The Court examined the submissions of counsel for both parties and the applicant’s request. It granted the applicant leave to withdraw the revision application, expressly allowing the parties to keep their contentions open for future reference. Consequently, the Court dismissed and disposed of the revision application.

Issues considered

  • Whether leave can be granted to withdraw a criminal revision application while keeping the applicant's contentions open

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural law
  • Bombay High Court
  • leave to withdraw

Judgment

                                                                           48-REVN-105-2026 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                  CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2026

                       Sachin Arts India Pvt Ltd                        ...Applicant/s
                       Versus
                       Aditya Chandrakumar Kothari and Anr.             ...Respondent/s
VAISHALI
ANIL                   _________________________________________________________________
TIKAM
                       Mr. Dinesh D. Tiwari a/w. Pulkeshi Gaikwad a/w. Anthony Parel a/w.
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
                       Kanishka Sharma a/w. Animish Dighe, Advocate for Applicant.
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
                       Ms. Madhura Mulay a/w. Sandeep Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
2026.08.25
10:59:10 +0530         Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                           CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                           DATE        :   21st AUGUST, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, Respondent No.1 and

                       learned APP.

                       2.         Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this

                       revision application with liberty to keep all contentions of the applicant

                       open.

                       3.         Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

                       Applicant, leave granted to withdraw the revision application with

                       aforesaid liberty.

                       4.         All contentions of both the parties are kept open.

                       5.         Application is dismissed and disposed of.



                                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

                                                       Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.