Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALAJI MUKUTRAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision applications are dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Balaji Mukutrao Shinde filed a series of criminal revision applications (Nos. 120-130 of 2019) against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant. The Court noted the absence of the applicant and observed that the applications were not prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision applications for non‑prosecution. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a revision application is filed but the applicant fails to appear or prosecute the matter?

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                                                        8-REVN-120-2019 (CR).doc


    Shubhada S Kadam


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 122 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2019
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2019

                      Balaji Mukutrao Shinde                           ...Applicant/s
                      Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra                         ...Respondent/s
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      None for Applicant.
                      Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                       CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                       DATE         :   11th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                      P.C. :


                      1.       None present for the applicant.

                      2.       Dismissed for non-prosecution.



SHUBHADA                                                          (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.12
15:56:45 +0530




                                                    Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.