Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SARAFARAJ HAMID SHAIKH MANIYARversusSAMRINBANO W/O SARAFARAJ SHAIKH MANIYAR AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.

Summary

The petitioner filed Criminal Revision Application No. 123 of 2022 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, in an order dated 04.09.2026, warned that if the petitioner failed to appear, the matter would be dismissed. On 28 September 2026, the petitioner again failed to appear before the Court. The Court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the revision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the criminal revision application for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear before the Court

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • procedural default
  • court appearance

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44231


                                                  *1*                    5revn123o22


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2022
                          SARAFARAJ HAMID SHAIKH MANIYAR
                                         VERSUS
                SAMRINBANO W/O SARAFARAJ SHAIKH MANIYAR AND
                                        ANOTHER
                                           ...
                None for the Applicant.
                                           ...

                                     CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.

                                     DATE : 28 September 2026

                P. C. :-

                1.             Vide order dated 04.09.2026, while recording

                absence of the applicant, this Court had already observed that if

                none appears for the applicant, this Court would dismiss the

                matter.


                2.             Today, none appears for the applicant.


                3.             In view of the above, this Court finds that the

                applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the

                Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for want of

                prosecution.


        kps                                ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.