Bombay High Court
ARUN MOTIRAM PATILversusDATTATRAY BHURYA PATIL and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
Leave to withdraw the revision application was granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Arun M. Patil, filed a criminal revision application against Dattatray B. Patil and others. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, and the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the revision. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It granted leave to withdraw the application. Consequently, the revision application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may grant leave to withdraw a criminal revision application after settlement of the dispute
Subjects
- revision
- withdrawal
- settlement
- criminal procedure
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
DINESH
SADANAND
SHERLA
Digitally signed by
DINESH SADANAND
SHERLA
Date: 2026.09.02
906-revn-124-2004.odt
18:58:07 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2004
Arun M. Patil …Petitioner
V/s.
Dattatray B. Patil & Ors. ...Respondents.
…………..
Mr. Amit Anil Mane for the Petitioner.
Mr. Chaitanya Pendse a/w. Adv. Ilsa Shaikh for the Respondent
Nos.1 to 21.
Mr. Y.Y. Dabake, APP for the Respondent/State.
…………..
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 2.9.2026.
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties
have amicably settled their dispute. In that view of the matter,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
present revision application.
2. Leave granted. The Revision Application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
Dinesh S. Sherla 1/1
Checking your session…