Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KRISHNA BAJIRAO KOLHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is disposed of as infructuous because the applicant's acquittal eliminates any remaining controversy.

Summary

The applicant, Krishna Bajirao Kolhe, filed a criminal revision (Rev. App. No. 127 of 2018) challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting his discharge application dated 08-11-2017. During the pendency of the revision, the applicant was acquitted in the main trial (Sessions Case No. 161 of 2017). The applicant's counsel argued that the acquittal rendered the revision application moot. The High Court considered whether a revision remains viable after the substantive case has concluded in the applicant's favour. Finding that the acquittal eliminated any remaining controversy, the Court held the revision to be infructuous. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision challenging a discharge order becomes infructuous when the applicant is subsequently acquitted in the main trial

Subjects

  • revision
  • criminal procedure
  • discharge application
  • acquittal
  • infructuous

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
          RUSHIKESH
RUSHIKESH VISHNU
VISHNU    PATIL
PATIL     Date:
          2026.09.19
          11:17:50
                                                       1/2                 21 REVN.127.2018.odt
          +0530




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       REVISION APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2018


                       Krishna Bajirao Kolhe                        ..   Applicant
                                            Versus
                       State of Maharashtra                         ..   Respondent
                                                             …

                       Ms Racheeta Dhuru a/w Mr. Rajtilak Dhuru and Soutrik Kaur,
                       for the Applicant.
                       Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                              CORAM : ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.

                                                DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2026
                                                             ...

                       P.C:-

                       1.          Heard learned counsel, Ms Dhuru, for the Applicant. The

                       Application questions the rejection of the discharge application

                       vide order dated 08.11.2017 passed by the learned Additional

                       Sessions Judge, Pune. The learned counsel for the Applicant

                       submits that during the pendency of the Revision Application,

                       the Applicant is acquitted in the main proceedings before the

                       Trial Court, namely, Sessions Case No. 161 of 2017, and,

                       thereby, the Revision Application is now rendered infructuous.

                                   In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned


                       Rushikesh
                          2/2                    21 REVN.127.2018.odt

counsel for the Applicant, Criminal Revision Application No.

127 of 2018 stands disposed of as infructuous.



                                     (ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.)




Rushikesh


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.