Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAJID ABDUL RASHID ARAI ALIAS MOIN AHMED KADRI ALIAS GOTYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is allowed to be withdrawn and the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within six months.

Summary

The applicant, Sajid Abdul Rashid Arai, filed a criminal revision seeking leave to withdraw the application and requested that the trial of a 1999 offence be expedited. The learned counsel argued that the case had been pending for many years and urged the court to direct the trial court to conclude the trial within six months. The bench considered whether the revision could be withdrawn and whether it could issue a direction for speedy trial. It allowed the withdrawal of the revision application and ordered the trial court to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months of the order. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal case were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal revision application may be withdrawn at the applicant's request.
  • Whether the court can direct the trial court to expedite the pending trial of a crime registered in 1999.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of application
  • expeditious trial
  • delay in criminal proceedings
  • trial court direction

Judgment

                                                                            2-REVN-148-2026 (CR).doc


     Shubhada S Kadam


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2026

                            Sajid Abdul Rashid Arai Alias Moin Ahmed Kadri Alias Gotya
                                                       Versus
                                             The State of Maharashtra
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Wesley Menees along with Mr. Rishi Mehta i/b. Mr. Waqar Pathan,
                      Advocate for Applicant.
                      Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
                      PSI-Sjuit Mhaisdhune, Unit-9, DCB, CID, Crime Branch, Bandra, Mumbai,
                      present.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                            CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                            DATE        :   10th JULY, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.          Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for
                      respondent-State.
                      2.          Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave
                      to withdraw the application. Learned counsel for the applicant further
                      submitted that the crime is registered in the year 1999, hence, direction be
                      given to the Trial Court to expedite the trial.
                      3.          Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,
                      the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
                      4.          The Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial as
                      expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months from the receipt
                      of this order.

         Digitally
         signed by
         SHUBHADA                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
SHANKAR KADAM
KADAM    Date:
         2026.07.13
         19:07:43
         +0530

                                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.