Bombay High Court
VIJAY CHATURVEDIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The revision application was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant. The Court noted the absence of any prosecution against the applicant and consequently dismissed the revision application for non-prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were recorded. The judgment was delivered by Justice Shivkumar Dige on 7 October 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a revision application is filed without any prosecution against the applicant?
Subjects
- revision
- criminal procedure
- non-prosecution
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
10-REVN-154-2018 (CR).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. NO. 154 OF 2018
VAISHALI Vijay Chaturvedi ...Applicant/s
ANIL Versus
TIKAM The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI _________________________________________________________________
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2026.10.08 None for Applicant.
18:12:57 +0530
Mr. S.M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Ajay Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2-CBI
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for Applicant.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.