Bombay High Court
RAJU HAMMIRMAL JAINversusTREVOR JOSEPH CORREA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DEFAULT AT ADMISSION STAGE
Holding
The revision application was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear.
Summary
The applicant, Raju Hammirmal Jain, filed a criminal revision application but failed to appear before the High Court on the scheduled dates of 14th and 18th August 2026. The Court, after granting a further opportunity, noted the applicant's continued non-appearance. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision application on the ground of non-prosecution. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed as the matter was terminated procedurally. The dismissal was entered by order of Justice Madhav J. Jamdar.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision application may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant fails to appear before the Court
Subjects
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- failure to appear
- criminal revision
- procedural default
Judgment
9 REVN-189-2016.DOC
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 189 OF 2016
Raju Hammirmal Jain …Applicant
Vs.
Trevor Joseph Correa and Ors. …Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Savita M. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Shivraj Dubele, for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2026
P. C.:
1. This Court passed the following order on 14th August, 2026 :
“1. None appears for the Applicant.
2. To give one more opportunity to the
Applicant, stand over to 18th August 2026. To be
shown under the caption “For Dismissal”.”
2. Today also, none appears for the Applicant.
3. Accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1 of 1
18th August, 2026
Checking your session…