Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEELIP HIRASA AHADE (JAIN)versusSUMANBAI DEELIP AHADE (JAIN)

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

A revision application may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the applicant’s request, and any interim relief granted therein is vacated.

Summary

The applicant, Deelip Hirasa Ahade (Jain), filed Criminal Revision Application No. 200 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an earlier order. The respondent, Sumanbai Deelip Ahade (Jain), opposed the revision. During the hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to interfere, and the applicant’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court accepted the counsel’s statement and permitted the withdrawal. Accordingly, the revision application was dismissed as withdrawn and any interim relief previously granted was vacated. The court directed that the concerned lower court be informed of the dismissal.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application may be withdrawn by the applicant after filing
  • Whether interim relief granted in a revision application stands after the application is withdrawn

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of application
  • interim relief
  • High Court
  • procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23707
                                                        (1)           934crirevapln200.21.odt




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     934 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 200 OF 2021
                                         DEELIP HIRASA AHADE (JAIN)
                                                                                 ….Applicant
                                                     VERSUS

                                      SUMANBAI DEELIP AHADE (JAIN)
                                                                             …..Respondent


                Mr. Chaitanya Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant
                Mr. Prafullasing H. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate
                for the Respondent

                                                        CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                                           DATE : 17th JUNE, 2026


                PER COURT :

                1.                After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant,
                when this Court was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order
                at that time, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions,
                seeks leave to withdraw the Application.
                2.                His statement is accepted.
                3.                In view of the statement, the Revision Application is
                dismissed as withdrawn.
                4.                Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
                5.                Inform the concerned Court accordingly.



                                                              [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ]
                VishalK/934crirevapln200.21.odt



                                                                                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.