Bombay High Court
NILESH ASHOK JAGDALEversusSUVARANA NILESH JAGDALE
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The criminal revision application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Nilesh Ashok Jagdale, filed a criminal revision application (No. 210 of 2022) against Suvarna Nilesh Jagdale. The High Court, noting its earlier order that the matter would be dismissed for want of prosecution if no one appeared, observed that no party appeared on the scheduled date. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed. The dismissal was based solely on procedural non‑appearance.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when parties fail to appear for a scheduled hearing in a criminal revision application?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- want of prosecution
- procedural dismissal
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42949
210.22revn
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 210 OF 2022
NILESH ASHOK JAGDALE
VERSUS
SUVARANA NILESH JAGDALE
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026
P. C. :
1. Vide order dated 09/09/2026, this Court had already
observed that, if no one appears for the applicant on the next date of
hearing, this Court shall consider to dismiss this matter for want of
prosecution. Even after this order, nobody appears for the applicant
today.
2. In view of above, this criminal revision application is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]
sjk
Checking your session…