Bombay High Court
Pradeep Kumar Balkishan ShuklaversusThe State of Maharashtra
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The revision application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (c) and (d).
Summary
Pradeep Kumar Balkishan Shukla and another filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the lower court in a case against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants were represented by Ms. Sonam Pandey, assisted by Shifa Ansari, while the State was represented by Smt. Ranjana D. Humane. The court, after hearing counsel, allowed the revision in accordance with the specific prayer clauses (c) and (d) sought by the applicants. No detailed factual or legal reasoning was recorded in the short judgment. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of with the relief sought being granted.
Subjects
- criminal revision
- high court
- Bombay
- appellate jurisdiction
- prayer clauses
Judgment
48-REVN-214-2026 (CR).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 214 OF 2026
Pradeep Kumar Balkishan Shukla & Anr. ...Applicants
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Digitally signed
SONALI by SONALI
SATISH KILAJE
SATISH Date:
2026.08.21
Ms. Sonam Pandey a/w. Shifa Ansari, Advocate for Applicants.
KILAJE 18:29:03
+0530
Smt. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for the Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants.
2. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the
applicants, Revision Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (c)
and (d).
3. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…