Bombay High Court
SHIVANAND BHAGWANRAO MEHETREversusKAVITA SHIVANAND MEHETRE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The revision application is dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action no longer exists.
Summary
The applicant, Shivananand Bhagwanrao Mehetre, filed a criminal revision (904 CRR No. 237 of 2026) challenging a decision of the trial court. The applicant's counsel argued that the trial court proceedings had been withdrawn, so there was no longer any cause of action to support the revision. The court examined whether a revision could continue when the underlying proceedings no longer exist. Finding that the cause of action had vanished, the court held that the revision was infructuous. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision application can be dismissed as infructuous when the underlying trial court proceedings have been withdrawn and no cause of action remains.
Subjects
- criminal revision
- infructuous
- withdrawal of proceedings
- cause of action
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43644
237.26revn
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 237 OF 2026
SHIVANAND BHAGWANRAO MEHETRE
VERSUS
KAVITA SHIVANAND MEHETRE AND ANOTHER
…..
Mr A. G. Vasmatkar, Advocate for Applicant
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P. C. :
1. At the outset, learned Advocate Mr Vasmatkar for the
applicant states that the proceedings before the learned Trial Court has
been withdrawn and the cause of action to prosecute the present
revision application does not survive. He, therefore, submits that this
matter can be disposed of.
2. In view of above, this criminal revision application is
disposed of as infructuous.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]
sjk
Checking your session…