Bombay High Court
DEEPAK UDHARAM HARISINGANEYversusGEETA DEEPAK HARISINGANEY AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The revision application was dismissed because no prosecution had been instituted.
Summary
The applicant filed a criminal revision application seeking relief against the respondent. No counsel appeared for the applicant, and the respondent was represented by Smt. R.D. Humane. The court examined whether the prosecution had been instituted against the applicant. Finding that no prosecution was underway, the court dismissed the revision application. The dismissal was based on the lack of any prosecutorial action, and no further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal revision application should be entertained in the absence of any prosecution against the applicant
Subjects
- criminal revision
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
Judgment
11-REVN-239-2018 (CR).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. NO. 239 OF 2018
VAISHALI Deepak Udharam Harisinganey ...Applicant/s
ANIL Versus
TIKAM Geeta Deepak Harisinganey and anr.. ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI _________________________________________________________________
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2026.10.08 None for Applicant.
18:12:56 +0530
Smt. R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for Applicant.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.