Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHUSHAN@PRASHANT RAJENDRA GOSAVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the trial court's disposal of the case.

Summary

The applicant, Bhushan @ Prashant Rajendra Gosavi, filed a criminal revision application seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that the revision was infructuous because the trial court had already disposed of the case and submitted a Xerox copy of the judgment. The learned appellate counsel for the State, M. G. Patil, appeared for the respondent. The court, after noting the applicant's submission, held that the revision was indeed infructuous. Consequently, the revision application was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application is maintainable when the trial court has already disposed of the case

Subjects

  • revision
  • criminal procedure
  • infructuous
  • appellate jurisdiction
  • trial court disposal

Judgment

                                                                                          15-REVN-247-2019 (CR).doc


                             S.S.Kilaje


                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 247 OF 2019

                                   Bhushan @ Prashant Rajendra Gosavi                          ...Applicant
                                   VERSUS
          Digitally signed
          by SONALI
                                   The State Of Maharashtra                                    ...Respondent
SONALI SATISH
       KILAJE
SATISH Date:
KILAJE 2026.08.21
       15:25:11
          +0530

                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                   None for the Applicant.
                                   Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                   Ms. Nilam Jadhav, PSI, Wakad Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad.
                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                                         CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                         DATE         :   20th AUGUST, 2026.
                                   P.C. :

                                   1.        None for the applicant.

                                   2.        Heard learned APP.

                                   3.        Learned APP submits that this application is infructuous as the

                                   Trial Court has disposed of the trial. He tendered Xerox copy of the

                                   Judgment. It is taken on record.

                                   4.        In view of the statement of learned APP, Revision Application is

                                   rejected as become infructuous.



                                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.