Bombay High Court
NITIN GAJKUMAR MUKHEDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- ABATED
Holding
The revision application is abated due to the death of the sole applicant.
Summary
Nitin Gajkumar Mukhedkar filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel informed the court that the sole applicant had died. The court was required to consider whether the pending revision could continue in the absence of the applicant. Relying on established principles that a criminal revision stands abated upon the death of the sole applicant, the court held that there was no longer any party with locus standi to pursue the matter. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as abated.
Issues considered
- Does the death of the sole applicant abate a pending criminal revision application?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- abatement
- death of applicant
- locus standi
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42723
*1* 34revn248o22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2022
NITIN GAJKUMAR MUKHEDKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Shri Pande Balraj Prakash, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. A.S. Mantri, APP for the Respondents/ State.
Shri Piratwad Prakash M., advocate for respondent No.2.
...
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 15 September 2026
(Through VC)
P. C. :-
1. At the outset, the learned advocate for the applicant
states that the sole applicant (Nitin Mukhedkar) has expired.
2. In view of the above statement, the Criminal
Revision Application is disposed of as abated.
kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
Checking your session…