Bombay High Court
SAMADHAN SHANTARAM KUMAWATversusPOOJA SAMADHAN KUMAWAT AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The revision application is dismissed due to the applicant's failure to appear on the adjourned date.
Summary
Samadhan Shantaram Kumawat filed a criminal revision application against Pooja Samadhan Kumawat and another. The High Court, after noting that the applicant had not appeared on the adjourned date despite a prior warning, dismissed the revision application. The court had earlier warned on 14 August 2026 that failure to appear would result in dismissal. No arguments were presented by the applicant on the scheduled date of 29 August 2026. Consequently, the matter was dismissed for non‑appearance.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a party's failure to appear on the adjourned date in a criminal revision proceeding?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- non‑appearance
- dismissal
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39470
1/1 920-REVN-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2019
Samadhan Shantaram Kumawat
VERSUS
Pooja Samadhan Kumawat And Anr
…..
Mr. R. A. Tambe, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 29 AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Vide order dated 14 August 2026, this Court observed that if
none appeared on behalf of the applicant on the adjourned date of
hearing, this Court would be constrained to dismiss the matter.
Hence, as nobody appearing on behalf of the applicant, the matter
is dismissed.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)
Kiran Kawre
Checking your session…