Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRATAP MAHADEV CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the revision application with liberty to keep all contentions open.

Summary

Pratap Mahadev Chavan filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the revision while reserving the right to raise all his contentions in the future. The court considered the counsel's submission and granted permission to withdraw the application. The revision was consequently disposed of as withdrawn, and the court ordered that any other pending applications, if any, be similarly disposed of. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may grant leave to withdraw a criminal revision application while allowing the applicant to keep his contentions open.

Subjects

  • revision
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                                                          50-REVN-279-2026 (CR).doc

                            S.S.Kilaje


                                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 279 OF 2026

                                     Pratap Mahadev Chavan                                       ...Applicant/s
                                             VERSUS
                                     The State Of Maharashtra                                    ...Respondent/s
         Digitally signed
SONALI   by SONALI
         SATISH KILAJE
SATISH   Date:
         2026.09.29
KILAJE   11:49:49
         +0530
                                         _________________________________________________________________

                                     Mr. Tejas P. Hilage, Advocate for Applicant (Through VC).
                                     Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                                     Mr. Ajay S. Patil, Advocate for CBI-ACB.
                                     _________________________________________________________________

                                                                           CORAM       : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                           DATE        : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                     P.C. :

                                     1.          Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP.

                                     2.          Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave

                                     to withdraw the application with liberty to keep all contentions of the

                                     applicant open.

                                     3.          Considering the submission of learned Counsel for the

                                     applicant, the Application is allowed to be withdrawn.

                                     4.          Disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                     5.          All pending applications, if any, also disposed of.



                                                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                       Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.