Bombay High Court

MAHESH BHAUSAHEB JATADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court ordered the correction of the order as prayed and disposed of the motion.

Summary

Mahesh Bhausaheb Jatade filed a criminal revision application. The order dated 10/09/2026 erroneously stated that the revision was disposed, whereas only prayer clause (C) was allowed. The applicant sought deletion of the erroneous paragraph and addition of specific clauses, including issuance of notice to respondent No.2 and waiver of service by respondent No.1. The court considered the request for correction of the order. It directed that the necessary corrections be made and the corrected order be uploaded, thereby disposing of the motion.

Issues considered

Whether the order dated 10/09/2026 requires correction to delete the statement that the revision application was disposed
Whether the court may add the prayed clauses regarding notice, waiver of service, and call record

Subjects

criminal revision
order correction
procedural law
court order amendment

Judgment

                                                            298.26revn
                                    (1)

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

     CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.298 OF 2026

Mahesh Bhausaheb Jatade                               ….Applicant

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Another                  ….Respondents
                                    …..
Mr Yuvraj S. Choudhari, Advocate for Applicant
Mr M. A. Aher, APP for Respondent No.1/State
                               …..
                         CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.

                                 DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026
P. C. :


1.           Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

2.           This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order

dated 10/09/2026. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that

paragraph No.6 of the said order inadvertently states that criminal

revision application has been disposed of in the above terms.

However, the revision application was not disposed of and this Court

had only allowed prayer clause (C). He, therefore, prays for necessary

corrections in the said order.

3.           In view of above, paragraph 6 of the order dated

10/09/2026 be deleted. Following clauses also be added in the said

order :
                                                           298.26revn
                                   (2)

      (I)    Issue notice to the respondent No.2, returnable on

      12/10/2026.

      (II)   Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of

      respondent No.1

      (III) Call Record and Proceedings.



4.           Aforesaid necessary corrections be made in the order and

the corrected order be uploaded.


5.           This motion stands disposed of.




                                     [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]
sjk

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…