Bombay High Court

UTTAMRAO HARIBHAU KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal: Withdrawn

Holding

The revision application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Uttamrao Haribhau Kadam filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the lower court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the revision application without addressing its merits. No reasons were given for dismissal as the application was withdrawn. Consequently, the matter stands closed without any substantive adjudication.

Issues considered

Whether a criminal revision application can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the applicant's request

Subjects

criminal revision
withdrawal of application
court procedure

Judgment

                                   -1-

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

        946 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2026

                     UTTAMRAO HARIBHAU KADAM
                               VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Mr.R.G.Hange h/f Mr.A.R.Hange, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.A.A.A.Khan, APP for the Respondent/State.

                    ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )

                        DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026

PER COURT :


1.             Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the

learned APP for quite some time.         When this Court shown it’s

disinclination to entertain the application, the learned Advocate for the

Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant criminal revision

application.



2.             As the learned Advocate for the Applicant is withdrawing

this application, this Court is not giving any reasons for dismissing the

Application.




khs/Sept.2026/304
                                    -2-

3.             In view of the above, this criminal revision application

stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that this Court has not

considered this matter on merits.


                                      ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




khs/Sept.2026/304

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…