Bombay High Court
IMRAN AKIL SAYYADversusSAU JASMIN SHABIR SHAIKH
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The criminal revision application was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Imran Akil Sayyad, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant on the scheduled date, nor on the previous date. The respondent, represented by Mr. S. S. Pednekar, was present. The Court observed the applicant's failure to prosecute the application and consequently dismissed it. The dismissal was based solely on the applicant's non‑appearance and lack of prosecution of the matter.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when an applicant fails to appear and prosecute a criminal revision application?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- non-prosecution
- procedural default
- court dismissal
Judgment
55-REVN-333-2025 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2025
Imran Akil Sayyad ...Applicant/s
Versus
Sau Jasmin Shabir Shaikh ...Respondent/s
_________________________________________________________________
None for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for the applicant. On last date also, none was
present for the applicant.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
11:13:48 +0530 Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…