Bombay High Court
SMT. URVI VITHAL THAKKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The revision application is abated and disposed of because the sole applicant has died.
Summary
Smt. Urvi Vithal Thakkar filed a criminal revision seeking to challenge the concurrent conviction and sentence imposed on her. The revision was filed under Criminal Revision Application No. 346 of 2004. The court noted that the sole revision applicant had died on 6 February 2021. Since the applicant was the only party seeking relief, the court held that the revision could not proceed. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as abated and any interim relief that had been granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the death of the sole revision applicant on pending criminal revision proceedings?
Subjects
- revision
- abated
- death of applicant
- criminal conviction
- concurrent sentencing
Judgment
23-REVN-346-2004.doc
Digitally signed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
by
HUSENBASHA
HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
RAHAMAN NADAF
NADAF
Date:
2026.09.11
19:52:34 +0530 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 346 OF 2004
Smt. Urvi Vithal Thakkar ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
***
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik APP for Respondent/State
***
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C. :
1. This revision application is filed challenging concurrent finding
of conviction and sentence. Sole Revision Applicant is reported to
have expired on 06.02.2021, as per office note.
2. Considering that the sole Revision Applicant/accused is no
more, revision application is disposed of as abated. Interim / ad-
interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Husen 1
Checking your session…