Bombay High Court

Mohsin Akil BurondkarversusThe State of Maharashtra and Another

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is disposed of per the consent terms dated 24 September 2026.

Summary

The applicant, Mohsin Akil Burondkar, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 354 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. Both parties submitted consent terms dated 24 September 2026, which were signed in the presence of counsel and identified by the court. The counsel explained the contents to the signatories, and the court recorded the consent terms as an undertaking. The court accepted all statements in the consent terms as valid undertakings. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of in accordance with the consent terms, and the order was authenticated for implementation.

Issues considered

Whether the consent terms signed by the parties can be treated as a valid undertaking to the court for disposing the criminal revision application?

Subjects

consent order
criminal revision
undertaking
high court
disposal

Judgment

                                                 26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

           CR. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 354 OF 2025

Mohsin Akil Burondkar                       … Applicant
           V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Another        … Respondents

Mr. Yogesh Morbale, advocate for the Applicant
Mr. Anand S. Patil a/w Mr. Soham V. Pawar a/w Mr. Pratik B.
Bhakare, advocate for Respondents
Mr. Avinash Naik, APP for the State



                            CORAM      : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.


                            DATED      : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026
P.C.:
1.      Both the learned counsel have tendered consent terms dated

24 September 2026. They submit that their respective parties have

signed in their presence, and they identify their signatures.

Learned counsel for the parties state that they have explained to

the signatories the contents of consent terms and the signatories

have signed the consent terms after understanding the contents.

Learned counsel for Appellant state that all the signatories are also

present in Court, and they identify their respective clients. The

consent terms are taken on record and marked as 'X' for

identification.


                                1/11
adn
                                              26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx


2.    For ease of reference, the scanned copy of the consent terms

is reproduced hereinbelow:




                               2/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      3/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      4/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      5/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      6/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      7/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      8/11
adn
             26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      9/11
adn
              26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx




      10/11
adn
                                                  26-REVN-354-2025-(CR).docx



3.      All statements made in the consent terms are accepted as an

undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also

accepted.


4.      Criminal Revision Application No.354 of 2025 stands

disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 24 September

2026.


5.      All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.




                                               (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




                                  11/11
adn

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…