Bombay High Court
SUBHASH S/O. VASANTRAO BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The revision application is infructuous and is therefore disposed.
Summary
Subhash filed Criminal Revision Application No. 370 of 2019 against the State of Maharashtra. While the revision was pending, the trial court framed charges and commenced evidence. The applicant's counsel argued that the cause of action no longer existed and the revision should be disposed. The court examined whether the revision remained maintainable after the charge was framed. Finding that the cause of action had become infructuous, the court disposed of the revision application.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision application remains maintainable after the charge is framed and evidence has commenced
Subjects
- criminal revision
- infructuous
- charge framed
- evidence commenced
- procedural law
Judgment
37.REVN.370.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 370 OF 2019
Subhash S/o. Vasantrao Bhosale ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
***
Mr. Sayaji S. Nawale h/f Ms. Jayashree R. Ghorpade (Nawale),
Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. A.A.A. Khan, APP for Respondent – State.
***
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Mr. Sayaji Nawale, learned counsel holding for Ms.
Jayashree Ghorpade, learned counsel for the Applicants, submits that,
during the pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Application, the
charge came to be framed and the evidence has also commenced. He
therefore, submits that the instant Criminal Revision Application be
disposed of.
2. Hence, as the cause of action does not survive, the instant
Criminal Revision Application is disposed of as infructuous.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
Shrikant Malani Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…