Bombay High Court
SNEHA ARUN DEOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
Both criminal revision applications are disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sneha Arun Deo, filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 37 and 39 of 2023) against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the matters, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sohail Subhedar, on behalf of Advocate Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, informed the court that evidence had commenced and sought permission to withdraw both applications. The Court, after considering the request, ordered that both revision applications be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the revisions were examined. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar on 2 September 2026.
Subjects
- withdrawal
- criminal revision
- procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40158
37.23revn etc
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2023
SNEHA ARUN DEO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2023
SNEHA ARUN DEO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
…..
Mr Sohail Subhedar, Advocate h/f Mr N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for
Applicant
Mr Sachin S. Panale, Special PP and Mr A. A. A. Khan, APP for
Respondent/State
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
P. C. :
1. Learned Advocate Mr Subhedar, holding for Advocate Mr
Ghanekar for the applicant, on instructions, submits that during the
pendency of these matters, evidence has commenced. He, therefore,
seeks permission to withdraw both these matters.
2. In view of above, both these criminal revision
applications are disposed of as withdrawn.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]
sjk
Checking your session…