Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JYOTIRAM NAVNATH AUTADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The revision application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Jyotiram Navnath Autade, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 396 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the trial court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court, after hearing the counsel and the respondent’s APP, expressed its disinclination to entertain the matter and allowed the withdrawal. No merits of the revision were considered, and the Court expressly stated that the order should not influence the trial court. Consequently, the revision application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should entertain a criminal revision application after the petitioner seeks to withdraw it

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural law
  • high court jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44992




                                                  -1-

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      935 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2025

                                   JYOTIRAM NAVNATH AUTADE
                                            VERSUS
                            THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

              Mr.N.R.Thorat, Advocate for the Applicant.
              Mr.A.A.A.Khan, APP for the Respondent/State.

                                   ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )

                                      DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026

              PER COURT :


              1.             After hearing the learned Advocate and the learned APP for

              the respective parties, when this Court has expressed it’s disinclination,

              the learned Advocate for the Applicant sought permission to withdraw

              the instant revision application.



              2.             As the learned Advocate for the Applicant is withdrawing

              this Revision Application, this Court is not giving any reasons for

              dismissing the application.



              3.             The instant Criminal Revision Application is, therefore,



              khs/Sept.2026/396
                                   -2-

dismissed, as withdrawn.      It is made clear that this Court has not

considered the instant matter on merits and the learned Trial Court

shall not influence by the order of this Court.




                                       ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




khs/Sept.2026/396


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.