Bombay High Court

SAMARTH COLLECTIONversusSUSHIL CREATIONS SHRI. SUSHIL PREMCHAND VANJANI

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 1 October 2026.

Summary

Samarth Collection filed a criminal revision application against Sushil Creations and Shri Sushil Premchand Vanjani. Both parties, through their counsel, presented consent terms dated 1 October 2026, which were read, identified, and marked in the court record. The consent terms were accepted as an undertaking to the court, and the parties agreed to the contents. The court, after confirming the authenticity of the signatures and the understanding of the parties, ordered that the revision application be disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. The order was authenticated and directed to be acted upon by all parties.

Issues considered

Whether the criminal revision application should be disposed of based on the parties' consent terms

Subjects

Criminal Revision
Consent Order
Disposition

Judgment

                                                  34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

               CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 414 OF 2023

Samarth Collection                              … Applicant
           V/s.
Sushil Creations Shri. Sushil Premchand
Vanjani                                         … Respondent
                ________________________
Adv. Anand Patil, for the applicant.
Adv. Changdev Shingade i/b Adv. Sagar Tambe, for the
respondent. _________________________

                              CORAM        : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.


                              DATED        : OCTOBER 1, 2026
P.C.:
1.      Both the counsels have tendered consent terms dated 1

October 2026. They submit that their respective parties have signed

in their presence and they identify their signatures. Learned counsel

for the parties state that they have explained to the signatories the

contents of consent terms and the signatories have signed the consent

terms after understanding the contents. Learned counsel for applicant

state that all the signatories are also present in Court and they

identify their respective clients. The consent terms are taken on

record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.


2.      For ease of reference, scanned copy of the Consent Terms is

reproduced herein below:-



                                  1/7
Rushi
              34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc




        2/7
Rushi
              34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc




        3/7
Rushi
              34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc




        4/7
Rushi
              34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc




        5/7
Rushi
              34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc




        6/7
Rushi
                                                     34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc


3.      All statements made in consent terms are accepted as

undertaking given to this Court. All Statements are also accepted.


4.      The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms

of Consent Terms dated 1 October 2026.


5.      All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.



                                                   (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




                                    7/7
Rushi

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…