Bombay High Court
Rameshwar Bhausaheb TopeversusState of Maharashtra
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court ordered that the appearance of the advocate be recorded and the paragraph granting leave to file a vakalatnama be inserted, with the corrected order to be uploaded.
Summary
The applicant, Rameshwar Bhausaheb Tope, filed a criminal revision application challenging certain procedural omissions in the order dated 05.10.2026. The revision sought to have the appearance of Ms. Ankita Balasaheb Ugalmugale, assisted by Mr. Tribhuvan Sharma, recorded in the order and to insert a paragraph granting leave to file a vakalatnama on behalf of the first informant. The Court examined the praecipe filed on 08.10.2026 and found that the original order indeed omitted the advocate’s appearance and the specific paragraph. Accordingly, the Court directed that the appearance be noted and the paragraph be added, and that the corrected order be uploaded. The remainder of the original order was left unchanged, and the praecipe was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dated 05.10.2026 should be corrected to record the appearance of Ms. Ankita Balasaheb Ugalmugale and to insert a paragraph granting leave to file a vakalatnama on behalf of the first informant.
Subjects
- revision
- correction of order
- vakalatnama
- procedural order
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
501-REVN-430-2025.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 430 OF 2025
Rameshwar Bhausaheb Tope ...Applicant/s
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondent/s
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
SATISH Date:
SATISH KILAJE
KILAJE 17:07:56 +0530
2026.10.09
None for Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
Ms. Ankita B. Ugalmugale a/w Mr. Tribhuvan Sharma, Advocate for
Respondent No.2.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. Perused the praecipe dated 08.10.2026 for speaking to minutes
of order dated 05.10.2026. In the Order dated 05.10.2026, the appearance
of “Ms. Ankita Balasaheb Ugalmugale a/w Mr. Tribhuvan Sharma,
Advocate for Respondent No.2” is not mentioned and paragraph No.7 be
added as “Leave to file vakalatnama on behalf of first informant.”
3. In view of above, appearance of “Ms. Ankita Balasaheb
Ugalmugale a/w Mr. Tribhuvan Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.2”
be mentioned and paragraph No.7 be added as ““Leave to file vakalatnama
on behalf of first informant.”
Page 1 of 2
501-REVN-430-2025.doc
S.S.Kilaje
4. Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order and
the corrected order be uploaded. Rest of the order shall remain as it is.
5. Praecipe is disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.