Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAMOD BHARAT GANGURDEversusARCHANA PRAMOD GANGURDE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is dismissed, and the earlier criminal application is disposed of as nothing survives.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Revision Application No. 431 of 2019 filed by Vaishali Anil Tikam and Pramod Bharat Gangurde against Archana Pramod Gangurde and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. Akshay Pawar with counsel Vasim Siddiqui and Faiz Ali Khan, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Rahul Motkari with Mr. Manasi Pawar, and the State by Mr. B.B. Kulkarni. The court considered whether the revision application should proceed in view of the earlier Criminal Application No. 346 of 2018. Justice Shivkumar Dige dismissed the revision application, holding that no relief remained pending in the earlier application. Consequently, the earlier application was also disposed of as nothing survived.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of the Criminal Revision Application No. 431 of 2019 in light of the dismissal of the earlier Criminal Application No. 346 of 2018?

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • high court
  • procedure
  • dismissal
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                                       2-REVN-431-2019 (CR)-(2).doc

                   Tikam


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2019
                                                     WITH
VAISHALI                        CRIMINAL APPLICATION IN REVISION NO. 346 OF 2018
ANIL
TIKAM
                       Pramod Bharat Gangurde                                 ...Applicant/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI            VERSUS
ANIL TIKAM
Date:                  Archana Pramod Gangurde And Ors.                       ...Respondent/s
2026.09.11
19:26:43 +0530

                       _________________________________________________________________

                       Mr. Akshay Pawar a/w. Vasim Siddiqui a/w Mr. Faiz Ali Khan,Advocate
                       for Applicant.
                       Mr. Rahul Motkari a/w. Mr. Manasi Pawar, for Respondent No.1.
                       Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                         CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                         DATE         : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, Respondent No.1 and

                       learned APP.

                       2.          In view of dismissal of the Criminal Revision Application,

                       nothing survives in the Criminal Application No.346 of 2018 and it is

                       accordingly disposed of.



                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.