Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

FAIYAJ IQBAL AAGAversusAVINASH BHUPAL DHANAWADE AND ANR

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The criminal revision application is allowed in accordance with the consent terms and the relief sought under prayer clause (b).

Summary

The applicant and the first respondent filed consent terms on 17 September 2026, which were identified and recorded by the court. The consent terms were accepted as an undertaking to the court. No substantive factual dispute was presented; the matter hinged on the parties' agreement. The court considered the validity of the consent terms as a basis for deciding the revision application. Relying on the parties' undertakings, the court allowed the criminal revision application in accordance with the consent terms, specifically granting relief under prayer clause (b). The decision was pronounced by Justice Rajesh S. Patil.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of consent terms filed by the parties on the disposition of a criminal revision application?

Subjects

  • consent terms
  • criminal revision
  • undertaking
  • High Court of Bombay
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                   16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


             CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 438 OF 2018
Faiyaj Iqbal Aaga                         … Applicant
             V/s.
Avinash Bhupal Dhanawade And Anr          … Respondents
                ________________________
Mr. Omkar Koratkar h/f. Mr. Balwant Salunkhe, Advocate
for the Applicant.
Mr. Nikhil Pawar a/w. Mr. Rajdeep Shitole, Advocate for
respondent.
                _________________________

                             CORAM        : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.


                             DATED        : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026
P.C.:


1.      The advocates appearing for the applicant - accused and

respondent no. 1 - complainant have tendered consent terms dated 17

September 2026. They have identified the signatures of their respective

clients on the consent terms and they also identify the presence of their

client in this Court. The consent terms being tendered in the Court, the

same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification purpose.


2.      For ease of reference, the scan copy of the consent terms is

reproduced hereinbelow :-




                                   1/4
adn
            16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx




      2/4
adn
            16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx




      3/4
adn
                                                   16-REVN-438-2018 (CR).docx



3.    The statements made in the consent terms are accepted as an

undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted.


4.    The Criminal Revision Application stands allowed in terms of the

consent terms and prayer clause (b) stands allowed.




                                                 (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




                                  4/4
adn


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.