Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRITIBALA PARESH ASHARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The applicant, Pritibala Paresh Ashar, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared for the applicant on the hearing date, nor on the previous date. The court noted the absence of the applicant and dismissed the revision application on the ground of non‑prosecution. No evidence or arguments were recorded. The matter was concluded without any order on the merits.

Judgment

                                                                                        43-REVN-45-2026 (CR).doc


                              N.S.Kamble



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2026

                              Pritibala Paresh Ashar                          ...Applicant
                              VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra                        ...Respondent
           Digitally signed
NILAM
           by NILAM
        SANTOSH
                              _________________________________________________________________
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date:
        2026.09.24            None for the Applicant.
           17:16:41 +0530
                              Mr.M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State.
                              _________________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM          : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026

                              P.C. :

                              .             None present for the Applicant.

                              2.            On the last date also none was present for the Applicant.

                              3.            Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.