Bombay High Court

SHRI PRAVIN BIRU SHISTEversusSHRI ASHOK APANNA SHISHTE

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The criminal revision application is disposed of per the parties' consent terms dated 21 August 2026.

Summary

The applicant, Shri Pravin Biru Shiste, filed a criminal revision application against respondents Shri Ashok Apanna Shishte and another. Both parties entered into consent terms dated 21 August 2026, which were signed in the presence of their counsel and explained to them. The court, after verifying the consent, accepted the undertakings as binding. No substantive merits of the revision were examined. Consequently, the court disposed of the criminal revision application in accordance with the consent terms.

Issues considered

What procedural steps are required to dispose of a criminal revision application by mutual consent of the parties?

Subjects

consent order
criminal revision
procedural disposal
mutual settlement
court undertakings

Judgment

                                                           501-cra-450-2024.docx


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

             CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.450 OF 2024

Shri Pravin Biru Shiste                    ...Applicant
       Versus
Shri. Ashok Apanna Shishte & Anr           ...Respondents
                              ——————
Mr. Prathamesh Patil a/w. Ms. Manjusha Bhosale i/b. P. Padmanabh
Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Ajay Rajenimbalkar i/b. Ms. Mrinal Shelar, Advocate for respondent
no.1.
Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the Respondents State.
                              ——————

                                    Coram :      RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

                                    Date     :   AUGUST 27, 2026.

P. C. :

1.        Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.

2.        The applicant as well as the respondents have entered into consent

terms dated 21 August 2026. The consent terms signed by the parties are

taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

3.        Mr. Prathamesh Patil and Mr. Ajay Rajenimbalkar, learned

Advocates for the respective parties, state that their respective clients

have signed the consent terms in their presence and they identify their

signatures. They further state that they have explained the contents of




adn                                 1 of 4
                                                      501-cra-450-2024.docx


the consent terms to the signatories and that the signatories have signed

the same after understanding the contents thereof. For ease of reference,

the consent terms are scanned and reproduced hereinbelow:—




adn                              2 of 4
               501-cra-450-2024.docx




adn   3 of 4
                                                       501-cra-450-2024.docx


4.    The submissions made in the consent terms are accepted as an

undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted.

5.     The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of

the consent terms dated 21 August 2026.

                                                    (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




adn                              4 of 4

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…