Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Sujata Jaiprakash ShroffversusState of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court disposed of the revision application as withdrawn, without hearing it on merit.

Summary

Sujata Jaiprakash Shroff filed Criminal Revision Application No. 495 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the revision, ordered the application to be withdrawn. Consequently, the pending applications were also disposed of. The judgment notes that no substantive issues were addressed on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application may be withdrawn at the applicant's request

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural law
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                        36-REVN-495-2025 (CR).doc


                              N.S.Kamble



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 495 OF 2025

                              Sujata Jaiprakash Shroff                        ...Applicant
                              VERSUS
                              State Of Maharashtra                            ...Respondent
           Digitally signed
NILAM
           by NILAM
        SANTOSH
                              _________________________________________________________________
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date:
        2026.09.24            Mr.Chandansingh Shekhavat i/b Mr.Niranjan Pachpute i/b Parinam Law
           17:16:43 +0530
                              Associates, for the Applicant.
                              Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
                              Ms.Snehal Patil, PSI, Chatushrungi Police Station.
                              _________________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM          : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026

                              P.C. :

                              .             Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for

                              the Respondent-State.

                              2.            The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks

                              leave to withdraw the Application.         The Application is disposed of as

                              withdrawn.

                              3.            All pending Applications are disposed of.

                              4.            It is made clear that this Court has not heard this Application on

                              merit.

                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.