Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SACHIN VILAS SHINDEversusKIRAN PRAKASH PATIL AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is disposed of by consent, permitting the complainant to withdraw the Rs.3,00,000 deposited by the accused.

Summary

Sachin Vilas Shinde filed a criminal revision application before the Kolhapur Circuit Bench of the Bombay High Court against Kiran Prakash Patil and another respondent. Both parties submitted consent terms dated 1 October 2026, which were signed in the presence of counsel and identified by the signatories. The court recorded the consent terms as an undertaking and accepted all statements therein. Accordingly, the revision application was disposed of by consent, and the court ordered that the Rs.3,00,000 deposited by the accused before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kolhapur, be withdrawn by the complainant, Kiran Prakash Patil. The order was directed to be acted upon by all parties on an authenticated copy.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • consent order
  • deposit withdrawal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                                       30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 52 OF 2023

Sachin Vilas Shinde                              … Applicant
             V/s.
Kiran Prakash Patil And Anr.                     … Respondents
                   ________________________
Adv. Samay Pawar (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Vaibhav Halake a/w Adv. Sairaj
Surywanshi, for the applicant.
Ms. Shubhangi Deshmukh, for the respondent – State.
Adv. Mahalingam Pandharge (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Ajay Pareskar, for the
respondent no.1. _________________________

                               CORAM       : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

                               DATED       : OCTOBER 1, 2026
P.C.:
1.      Both the counsels have tendered consent terms dated 1 October

2026. They submit that their respective parties have signed in their

presence and they identify their signatures. Learned counsel for the

parties state that they have explained to the signatories the contents of

consent terms and the signatories have signed the consent terms after

understanding the contents. Learned counsel for applicant state that all

the signatories are also present in Court and they identify their

respective clients. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as

‘X’ for identification.


2.      For ease of reference, scanned copy of the Consent Terms is

reproduced herein below:-



                                    1/6
Rushi
              30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc




        2/6
Rushi
              30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc




        3/6
Rushi
              30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc




        4/6
Rushi
              30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc




        5/6
Rushi
                                                         30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc


3.      All statements made in consent terms are accepted as

undertaking made to this Court. All Statements are also accepted.


4.      The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of

Consent Terms dated 1 October 2026.


5.      By consent, in view of the Consent Terms entered into between

the parties and duly signed by them, the amount of Rs.3,00,000/-

deposited by the accused before the Judicial Magistrate First Class

(J.M.F.C), Kolhapur, is allowed to be withdrawn by the complainant

(Kiran Prakash Patil).


6.      All parties to act on authenticated copy of this order.




                                                      (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




                                     6/6
Rushi


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.