Bombay High Court
RAMESH PRAKASH YADAVversusMEERA RAMESH YADAV AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the revision application as requested by the applicant's counsel.
Summary
The applicant, Ramesh Prakash Yadav, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the petition while preserving all of his contentions. The court, after considering the counsel's submission, disposed of the application as withdrawn. Respondent No.1, Meera Ramesh Yadav, filed an affidavit-in-reply, which was taken on record. Subsequently, the court ordered that all pending applications in the matter be disposed of.
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- criminal revision
- court procedure
Judgment
14-REVN-556-2019 (CR).doc
N.S.Kamble
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 556 OF 2019
Ramesh Prakash Yadav ...Applicant
VERSUS
Meera Ramesh Yadav And Anr ...Respondents
Digitally signed
NILAM
by NILAM
SANTOSH
_________________________________________________________________
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date:
2026.09.24 Mr.Sunil R. More, for the Applicant.
17:16:45 +0530
Mr.Mayura R. Shinde, for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned counsel for
Respondent No.1 and learned APP.
2. The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the Petition keeping all his contentions open.
3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the
Applicant, the Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
4. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 tendered affidavit-in-
reply, it is taken on record.
5. All pending Applications are disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.