Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR NARENDRA KUMAR JOSHIversusDEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CBI ACB PUNE

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court granted the Special Public Prosecutor time to file an affidavit, kept interim relief in force, and listed the matter for a later date.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard three criminal revision applications filed by Vaishali Anil, Mr. Narendra Kumar Joshi and Mr. Vijendra Kumar Dhyani against Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI. Counsel for the applicants and the Special Public Prosecutor appeared. The Special Public Prosecutor requested additional time to file an affidavit in reply. The Court granted the request, ordered that any interim relief previously granted remain in force, and adjourned the matter to 9 October 2026 for further hearing.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • procedural order
  • interim relief
  • affidavit filing

Judgment

                                                                          22-REVN-523-2024 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 523 OF 2024

VAISHALI               Amarpal Singh Badh                            ...Applicant/s
ANIL                   VERSUS
TIKAM
                       Deputy Superintendent Of Police Cbi           ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
                                                         WITH
2026.09.29
10:33:55 +0530
                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2023

                       Mr Narendra Kumar Joshi                       ...Applicant/s
                       VERSUS
                       Deputy Superintendent Of Police Cbi Acb
                       Pune                                          ...Respondent/s

                                                         WITH

                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2023

                       Mr Vijendra Kumar Dhyani                      ...Applicant/s
                       VERSUS
                       Deputy Superintendent Of Police               ...Respondent/s

                       _________________________________________________________________
                       Mr. Santosh Avhad i/by Jayakar & Partneers, Advocate for the Applicant.
                       Mr. Amit Munde, SPP a/w. Balaji Gurav a/w. Shantanu Nakashe for
                       Respondent -CBI.
                       Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for Respondent-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                          CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                          DATE        :   28th SEPTEMBER 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.        Learned counsel for the Applicant and learned SPP.

                       2.        Learned SPP seeks time to file affidavit in reply.

                       3.        Stand over to 09/10/2026.

                                                       Page 1 of 2
                                                     22-REVN-523-2024 (CR).doc

Tikam

    4.      Ad-interim relief, if any granted earlier, to continue till the next

    date.



                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                  Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.