Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SACHIN ANANTA PATILversusRAJESH LAXMAN GHOGARE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court ordered the applicant to deposit Rs.10,00,000 before the next date.

Summary

The petitioners Vaishali Anil Tikam and others filed criminal revision applications (Revn No. 612/2019 and 613/2019) before the Bombay High Court. The court heard counsel for both the applicants and the respondent. The respondent submitted that the applicant had already deposited Rs.7,00,000 as security. The bench directed the applicant to increase the deposit to Rs.10,00,000 and to make the payment before the next hearing. The matter was adjourned to 27 October 2026 for compliance. No substantive merits of the revision were decided, and the application remains pending pending the deposit.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant has complied with the required security deposit in the criminal revision proceedings

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • security deposit
  • procedural order
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                       11-REVN-612-2019 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 612 OF 2019

VAISHALI               Roshan Ananta Patil                         ...Applicant/s
ANIL                   VERSUS
TIKAM                  Deepak Laxman Ghogare And Anr               ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
                                                       WITH
Date:
2026.09.30
10:37:47 +0530                     CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3992 OF 2025
                                               IN REVN/612/2019

                       Roshan Ananta Patil                         ...Applicant/s
                       VERSUS
                       Deepak Laxman Ghoare                        ...Respondent/s

                                                       WITH

                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 613 OF 2019

                       Sachin Ananta Patil                         ...Applicant/s
                       VERSUS
                       Rajesh Laxman Ghogare And Ors               ...Respondent/s

                                                       WITH

                                   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3991 OF 2025
                                               IN REVN/613/2019

                       Sachin Ananta Patil                         ...Applicant/s
                       VERSUS
                       Rajesh Luxman Ghogare                       ...Respondent/s

                       _________________________________________________________________
                       Mr.Alankar Kirpekar a/w. Mr. Susmit Phatale a/w. Mr. Somanath Kale
                       a/w. Mr. Ayush Tiwari i/by Susmit Phatale, Advocates for the Applicant.
                       Mr. Pravin Desai, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                       Mr. S.M.Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________



                                                     Page 1 of 2
                                                       11-REVN-612-2019 (CR).doc

Tikam

                                      CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                      DATE         :   28th SEPTEMBER 2026.
    P.C. :

    1.        Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and Respondent No.1

    and learned APP.

    2.        Learned counsel for Respondent No.1 submits that Applicant

    has deposited Rs.7,00,000/-.

    3.        The Applicant shall deposit Rs.10,00,000/- before next date.

    4.        Stand over to 27/10/2026.



                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.