Bombay High Court
ASARAM S/O. DAGDOBA BHODGALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- ABATED
Holding
A criminal revision application abates upon the death of the applicant.
Summary
The petitioner, Asaram S/o Dagdobha Bhogdal, filed a criminal revision application (No. 63 of 2018) against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the application, the petitioner died, as confirmed by his counsel, Mr. Vishal A. Bagal. The respondent's counsel, Ms. B.B. Gunjal, was present. The Court considered whether the death of the applicant would affect the continuation of the revision proceeding. Relying on established procedural principles that a criminal revision abates upon the death of the applicant, the Court held that the application could not proceed. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as abated.
Issues considered
- Does the death of a petitioner in a criminal revision application result in the abatement of the proceeding?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- abated proceedings
- death of applicant
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38742
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2018
ASARAM S/O. DAGDOBA BHODGAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr.Vishal A.Bagal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms.B.B.Gunjal, APP for the Respondent/State.
( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The learned Advocate for the Applicant Mr.Bagal states that
he has confirmed the news of death of Asaram Bagdoba Bhogdal i.e. the
sole Applicant in this Criminal Revision Application and therefore the
instant Application be disposed of as abated.
2. Considering the above, this Criminal Revision Application
stands disposed of, as abated.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)
khs/Aug.2026/63
Checking your session…