Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVPRASAD ASARAMJI BHUTADAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The revision application is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Shivprasad Asaramji Bhutada filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by advocates B.N. Magar and S.J. Salunke, while the State was represented by A.A.A. Khan. The Court examined whether the revision remained viable for adjudication. Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar observed that, over the passage of time, the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of the revision application as infructuous, effectively dismissing the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal revision application is maintainable at this stage
  • Whether the passage of time renders the revision infructuous

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • infructuous
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39609


                                                 1/1                    947-REVN-9-2021


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       947 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2021

                                  Shivprasad Asaramji Bhutada
                                             VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                …..
                Mr. B. N. Magar h/f., Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for Applicant.
                Mr. A. A. A. Khan, APP for State.
                                                …..

                                            CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
                                            DATE : 29 AUGUST, 2026

                PER COURT :

                1.        Mr. Magar, holding for Mr. Salunke, learned counsel for the

                applicant, states that, during the passage of time, the instant

                matter has become infructuous. Hence, the matter is disposed of as

                infructuous.




                                                        (SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




                Kiran Kawre


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.