Bombay High Court
SHIVPRASAD ASARAMJI BHUTADAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The revision application is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Shivprasad Asaramji Bhutada filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by advocates B.N. Magar and S.J. Salunke, while the State was represented by A.A.A. Khan. The Court examined whether the revision remained viable for adjudication. Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar observed that, over the passage of time, the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of the revision application as infructuous, effectively dismissing the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal revision application is maintainable at this stage
- Whether the passage of time renders the revision infructuous
Subjects
- criminal revision
- infructuous
- high court
- dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39609
1/1 947-REVN-9-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
947 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2021
Shivprasad Asaramji Bhutada
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
…..
Mr. B. N. Magar h/f., Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. A. A. A. Khan, APP for State.
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 29 AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Mr. Magar, holding for Mr. Salunke, learned counsel for the
applicant, states that, during the passage of time, the instant
matter has become infructuous. Hence, the matter is disposed of as
infructuous.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)
Kiran Kawre
Checking your session…