Bombay High Court

SANTOSH VILASRAO YADAV AND ANR.versusSHAILENDRA VILASRAO YADAV AND ORS.

Disposal: Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the Review Petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The Applicants, Santosh Vilasrao Yadav & Anr., filed a Review Petition seeking to set aside a judgment dated 09 June 2025 in Civil Revision Application No. 322 of 2024. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the Review Petition and instead pursue appropriate proceedings challenging the earlier judgment. The Respondents, Shailendra Vilasrao Yadav & Ors., did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted leave to withdraw the Review Petition. Consequently, Review Application No. 1 of 2026 was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether a Review Petition may be withdrawn at the request of the applicant with the court's permission

Subjects

review petition
civil revision
withdrawal of review
procedural law
high court

Judgment

                                                               905-RPC-1-2026 (C).doc


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      REVIEW PETN. IN CRA NO. 1 OF 2026
                                     IN
                 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 322 OF 2024

Santosh Vilasrao Yadav & Anr..                         …...Applicants
      Versus.
Shailendra Vilasrao Yadav & Ors.                       …...Respondents


                                         ----
Mr. Kalpesh Patil, for the Applicants.
Mr. Dhanjanjayrao D. Rananaware, with Mr. Shubham Dhoble, and Mr.
Samarth Chavan, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
                                       -------

                                    Coram :     ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                    Date :      29th September 2026.

PER COURT :


1.       Heard Mr. Kaplesh Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr.

Dhanjanjayrao D. Rananaware, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and

2.


2.       By this Application, the Applicants have sought the following

substantive relief in prayer clause (a):

     a) “This Hon’ble Court be pleased to recall and set aside the 09.06.2025
         passed by this Hon’ble Court (Hon’ble Justice N J Jamadar) in Civil


Suresh                               1 of 2
                                                             905-RPC-1-2026 (C).doc


         Revision Application No.322 of 2024 and allow the Civil Revision
         Application No.322 of 2024.”

3.       After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Kalpesh Patil, learned

advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicants, seeks leave to

withdraw this Review Application with liberty to file appropriate proceedings

challenging the Judgment and Order dated 09.06.2025 passed in Civil

Revision Application No.322 of 2024. This request made by Mr. Kalpesh Patil,

learned advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Mr. Dhanjanjayrao D.

Rananaware, learned advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.


4.       In view of the statement made by Mr. Kalpesh Patil, learned advocate

for the Applicant, leave to withdraw the Review Application is granted.


5.       Review Application No.1 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.




                                            [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]




Suresh                                  2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…